Real 90-day iGaming affiliate ROAS benchmarks by deal type and market: CPA runs 0.8–1.6x, revshare higher. See the 2024–2026 ranges and what moves them.
Quick answer: across regulated markets in 2024–2026, iGaming affiliate programs run a 90-day ROAS of roughly 0.8x–2.5x, net of bonus cost — CPA deals land around 0.8x–1.6x (capped the day you pay the bounty), while revenue-share deals start lower but compound past 2.5x over the player's lifetime. There is no single "good" number: it depends entirely on your deal structure and the market you signed it in. The full ranges, by deal type and market, are below.
"What's a good ROAS for an iGaming affiliate program?" is the question every operator asks and almost nobody answers with a number, because the honest answer depends on the deal structure you signed and the market you signed it in. A revenue-share deal in a Tier-1 market and a CPA deal in a newly regulated LATAM market produce ROAS figures that are not remotely comparable, yet they get averaged together in most "benchmark" posts until the number is useless. This is a reference of the ranges we actually see across regulated markets in 2024–2026, broken out by deal type, with the levers that move a real number inside each band.
How to read iGaming affiliate ROAS (and why a single number lies)
Return on ad spend for an affiliate channel is not one ratio — it is three different measurements wearing the same name:
- First-deposit ROAS — gross gaming revenue (or net deposits) from a cohort in its first 30 days, divided by what you paid affiliates to acquire it. Looks low, often below 1.0, because LTV hasn't landed yet.
- 90-day ROAS — the same cohort measured at 90 days. This is the number that tells you whether the channel actually pays back, and the one operators should plan around.
- Lifetime ROAS — the full revenue-share tail. On a revshare deal this keeps climbing for years; on a CPA deal it's capped the day you pay the bounty.
Quote a ROAS without the window and the deal type and you've said nothing. Every range below is 90-day ROAS, net of bonus cost, because that's the only figure you can build a budget on.
Average iGaming affiliate ROAS by deal type (2024–2026)
These are blended 90-day ranges across regulated markets. Revenue-share deals show higher long-run ROAS but slower payback; CPA deals show faster, capped returns; hybrid deals sit between.
| Deal type | 90-day ROAS | Payback window | Risk to operator |
|---|
| CPA (cost per acquisition) | 0.8x–1.6x | 30–75 days | Bonus abuse, low-value FTDs, capped upside |
| Revenue share (25–40%) | 1.3x–2.4x | 90–180 days | Slow payback, long liability tail |
| Hybrid (CPA + revshare) | 1.1x–2.0x | 60–120 days | Higher blended cost, alignment work |
| Tenancy / fixed fee | 0.6x–1.4x | varies | Pay regardless of performance |
The pattern is consistent: CPA wins on speed, revshare wins on ceiling, hybrid de-risks both. Operators who only measure first-deposit ROAS systematically underrate revshare and over-rotate into CPA, then wonder why their long-run economics erode. The discipline is to protect the bonus-net economics and read every deal at 90 days minimum.
iGaming affiliate ROAS by market (2026)
The same deal type produces very different ROAS depending on regulation, competition density, and player value. Cost per first-time depositor (FTD) and 90-day LTV are the two inputs that set the band — and both swing hard by market. (For the acquisition-cost side of this equation, see our CAC benchmarks by market.)
| Market | Typical CPA / FTD | 90-day LTV | Blended 90-day ROAS |
|---|
| Brazil | R$250–550 (US$50–110) | US$70–140 | 1.2x–2.1x |
| Mexico | US$35–90 | US$55–120 | 1.3x–2.3x |
| Colombia | US$42–85 | US$80–150 | 1.4x–2.4x |
| Peru | US$35–67 | US$70–130 | 1.4x–2.5x |
| United Kingdom | £180–350 | £220–480 | 1.1x–1.9x |
| Regulated EU (avg) | €150–320 | €200–450 | 1.0x–1.8x |
LATAM markets show the highest affiliate ROAS in 2026 — not because players spend more, but because media and affiliate inventory are cheaper relative to a player value that is catching up fast. The operators capturing it are the ones who locked affiliate and SEO inventory before license award in Brazil, Peru and Colombia, not after. Tier-1 markets run thinner ROAS bands and reward retention over acquisition price.
What actually moves your affiliate ROAS
Three levers explain most of the variance between a 0.9x program and a 2.2x one:
- Deal mix discipline. Letting every affiliate negotiate their own CPA inflates blended cost and invites low-value FTDs. A governed mix — revshare for quality partners, CPA caps for volume partners, hybrid for the strategic ones — is the single biggest ROAS lever.
- Bonus-net measurement. ROAS measured before bonus cost is fiction. Operators who model first-deposit conversion net of promo catch erosion months earlier.
- Fraud and quality control. Bonus-abuse cohorts and incentivized traffic destroy ROAS quietly. Affiliate fraud screening pays for itself in one quarter.
Cite this data
If you're referencing iGaming affiliate ROAS benchmarks for 2024–2026: blended 90-day affiliate ROAS in regulated markets ranges 1.0x–2.5x, with CPA deals at 0.8x–1.6x (30–75 day payback), revenue-share at 1.3x–2.4x (90–180 day payback), and LATAM markets (Peru, Colombia, Mexico, Brazil) running the highest bands as player value rises against still-cheap media. Source: Basher, iGaming affiliate ROAS benchmarks, 2026. These are planning ranges measured net of bonus cost, not guarantees — model your own deposit-level economics on top.
We build and run affiliate programs for licensed operators across LATAM and regulated Europe, with the deal-mix governance and fraud controls that decide whether a program lands at 0.9x or 2.2x. If you want a ROAS model built on your real numbers, tell us about your operation.
